There are three distinct population segments of the California Tiger Salamander, but so far they are all recognized as the same species. Each population segmet has a different conservation status according to the U.S. Endangered Species Act:
- Central California DPS
-
Santa Barbara DPS
-
Sonoma County DPS
The pictures on this page are divided into these three populations.
|
Terrestrial Form - Central California Population |
|
Adult, Solano County
© Gary Nafis. Specimen courtesy of Brad Shaffer & Dylan Dietrich-Reed, UC Davis. |
|
|
|
|
Adult, Alameda County |
Adult, Monterey County |
Adult, Alameda County |
Adult, Alameda County |
|
|
|
|
Adult, Alameda County |
Adult, Alameda County |
Adult, Santa Cruz County |
Adult, San Joaquin County |
|
|
|
|
Adult, Solano County
© Gary Nafis. Specimen courtesy of Brad Shaffer & Dylan Dietrich-Reed, UC Davis. |
|
|
|
|
Adult, Madera County
© David Tobler |
Juvenile, Solano County. © Melissa Newman |
Juvenile, Solano County.
© Melissa Newman |
Juvenile, Solano County.
© Melissa Newman |
|
|
|
|
Adult, Solano County. © Melissa Newman |
Transformed juvenile observed on a rainy night in November, probably
leaving a breeding pond, in Contra Costa County. © Chad Lane |
Adult, San Joaquin County.
© James Rexroth |
|
|
|
|
Juveniles from a pit trap study, Solano County. © Melissa Newman |
Juvenile, Santa Clara County. © Jon Hirt |
Adult, Santa Cruz County
© Zachary Lim |
|
|
|
|
Adult, Contra Costa County © Jared Heald |
Adult, Alameda County © Jared Heald |
Adult, San Joaquin County
© Jared Heald |
|
|
|
|
Adult female, Solano County (captured and handled under Federal Recovery Permit and released at point of capture.) © Adam Clause |
Metamorph, Solano County (captured and handled under Federal Recovery Permit and released at point of capture.) © Adam Clause |
Juvenile, Sacramento County © Jon Hirt |
Adult, Alameda County © Jared Heald |
|
|
|
|
Adult, Yolo County © Grayson Lloyd |
This adult salamander was rescued from underneath a woodpile in a backyard near Knight's Ferry in Stanislaus County, photographed, then released nearby. |
Adult female, San Joaquin County
© Adam Gitmed |
|
|
|
|
Recently-metamorphosed gray-blue un-spotted juvenile, Santa Cruz County, Salamanders. This appearance is typical in a study area of Santa Cruz Long-toed Salamanders in Santa Cruz County.. © Leyna Stemle |
A group of adults found under a board in Santa Clara County. © Cait Hutnik |
Footprints and tail drag made at night by an adult male California Tiger Salamander at a pond filled with 18" - 20" of water, two weeks after the first good rain event in December in San Benito County. © Chris Bronny (Shown next to a U.S. dime for size comparison - diameter = .705 inches or 17.91 mm.) |
|
|
|
|
Terrestrial Form - Santa Barbara County Population |
|
Adult, Santa Barbara County
© Gary Nafis. Specimen courtesy of Brad Schaeffer & Dylan Dietrich-Reed, UC Davis. |
|
|
|
|
Adult, Santa Barbara County
© Gary Nafis. Specimen courtesy of Brad Shaffer & Dylan Dietrich-Reed, UC Davis. |
Adult, Santa Barbara County. © Gary Nafis. Specimen courtesy of Brad Shaffer & Dylan Dietrich-Reed, UC Davis. |
|
|
|
|
Adult male, Santa Barbara County © Spencer Riffle |
|
|
|
|
|
Adult female, Santa Barbara County © Spencer Riffle |
|
|
Terrestrial Form - Sonoma County Population |
|
|
Juvenile, Sonoma County © Edgar Ortega |
|
|
|
|
Adult, Sonoma County
© Edgar Ortega |
Adult, Sonoma County
© Edgar Ortega |
Adult, Sonoma County
© Andre Giraldi |
|
|
|
|
|
Ambystoma californiense x Ambystoma mavortium Hybrids |
|
|
|
|
Monterey County adult hybrid of A. t. mavortium - Barred Tiger Salamander and A. californiense. © Gary Nafis. Specimen courtesy of Brad Shaffer & Dylan Dietrich-Reed, UC Davis.
|
|
|
|
Eggs in a Contra Costa County pond, photographed in January and February (of different years) |
|
|
|
|
Egg in water with water mites nearby, early January 3rd, Contra Costa County
© Mark Gary |
Eggs in breeding pond on January 16th, Contra Costa County © Mark Gary |
Egg in Contra Costa County breeding pond, © Mark Gary
Left: egg on January 18th
Right: the same egg, January 23rd |
|
|
|
|
Maturing eggs in breeding pond, January 31st, Contra Costa County © Mark Gary |
Maturing eggs in breeding pond, February 6th, Contra Costa County.
Embryos have developed gills, some have hatched. © Mark Gary |
|
|
|
|
Maturing eggs in breeding pond, February 6th, Contra Costa County.
Embryos have developed gills, some have hatched. © Mark Gary |
Very mature egg close to hatching. Some pattern and gills are now visible on the larva and it is wiggling inside the egg, February 7th, Contra Costa County © Mark Gary |
|
|
|
More California Tiger Salamander Eggs |
|
|
|
|
Eggs, December 22nd,
Contra Costa County © Mark Gary |
The same eggs seen on the left ten days later on January 1st, Contra Costa County © Mark Gary |
Egg attached to a floating Cattail plant, Contra Costa County © Mark Gary |
Eggs, Contra Costa County
© Mark Gary |
|
|
|
|
Single egg, Alameda County
© Marcia Grefsrud/CDFW |
Eggs shown out of water, Santa Clara County © Rob Schell |
Eggs in water, Monterey County
© Shirley Tudor |
Eggs on a small stick underwater
© Bill Stagnaro |
|
|
|
|
Eggs taken out of water temporarily for photograph, Alameda County
© Joseph E. DiDonato |
Eggs taken out of water temporarily for photograph, Alameda County © Joseph E. DiDonato |
Eggs taken out of water temporarily for photograph, Alameda County
© Joseph E. DiDonato |
Eggs taken out of water temporarily for photograph, Alameda County
© Joseph E. DiDonato |
|
|
|
|
Eggs taken out of water temporarily for photograph, Alameda County
© Joseph E. DiDonato |
One egg photographed out of the water
© Bill Stagnaro
|
Eggs found in Contra Costa County © Mark Gary |
|
|
|
|
The danger of eggs laid in temporary ponds:
The eggs shown above were all laid underwater in December in a pond in Contra Costa County that did not retain water. As the pond leaked the eggs became stranded above water where they will dessicate and not hatch, shown here in mid January. © Mark Gary |
|
|
|
|
More eggs stranded in receding pond water in Contra Costa County. © Mark Gary |
This picture shows a single California Tiger Salamander egg on the top right with a much larger Sierran Treefrog egg sack on the bottom, in a pond in Contra Costa County. © Mark Gary |
This picture shows several California tiger salamander eggs deposited on branches in an Alameda County pond, with a large California Red-legged Frog egg mass above left. © Mark Gary |
|
|
|
|
|
California Tiger Salamander Aquatic Larvae |
|
|
|
Mature larva found in early May in Contra Costa County © Mark Gary |
Mature larvae found in April in Contra Costa County © Mark Gary |
Young larvae in natal pond, early March, Contra Costa County |
|
|
|
|
Mature larvae found in April in Contra Costa County © Mark Gary |
Young larvae in natal pond, early March, Contra Costa County © Lou Silva |
|
|
|
|
Young larvae in natal pond, early March, Contra Costa County |
Young larvae in natal pond, early March, Contra Costa County © Lou Silva |
|
|
|
|
Mature Larva in water
© Gary Nafis. Specimen courtesy of Brad Shaffer & Dylan Dietrich-Reed, UC Davis. |
Larva in breeding pond in early June, Contra Costa County. © Chad M. Lane |
|
|
|
Mature Larva in water
© Gary Nafis. Specimen courtesy of Brad Shaffer & Dylan Dietrich-Reed, UC Davis. |
Young larvae in natal pond, early March, Contra Costa County |
|
|
|
|
Mature larva, found in late November, Contra Costa County
© Marcia Grefsrud/CDFW |
Larvae swimming in natal pond in late June, Contra Costa County |
|
|
|
|
|
Larvae swimming in natal pond in late June, Contra Costa County |
|
|
|
|
|
Newly hatched larva, Sonoma County.
© Bill Stagnaro |
Newly hatched larva, Sonoma County.
© Bill Stagnaro |
Larvae, Santa Clara County © Rob Schell |
Egg and larva, Monterey County
© Shirley Tudor |
|
|
|
|
Larva next to Sierran Treefrog tadpoles for comparison, Alameda County. © Joseph E. DiDonato |
Light colored larva, Alameda County.
© Joseph E. DiDonato |
Larva, Contra Costa County, netted in an amphibian survey in late August. |
Larva showing pigment development, Alameda County © Joseph E. DiDonato |
|
|
|
|
Very mature larvae in water,
Solano County © Richard Porter |
Mature larva with gill remnants still visible found walking on land after leaving the breeding pond during a rainy period in mid May in Solano County.
© Richard Porter |
Pale, possibly albino, larva, Alameda County, seined by Permitted biologists.
© Michael Starkey
|
Light-colored morph larva from a turbid pool in Solano County
© Marcia Grefsrud/CDFW
Grefsrud told me that CTS researchers Trenham and Searcy have noticed light-colored morph larvae in turbid water and darker morph larvae in clear water. |
|
|
|
|
This huge larval California Tiger Salamander was captured temporarily under permit during an authorized pond survey in May. It is most likely an overwintering larva because neotenic CTS have not been reported.
|
Hatchling larva, Contra Costa County
© Mark Gary
This tiny larva was observed hatching from its egg and dropping to the pond bottom. Other recently-hatched larvae were observed resting on the bottom, where they were not yet able to swim.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The downside to breeding in ephemeral waters is that sometimes the water disappears before the larvae are ready to leave. These California Tiger Salamander larvae were stranded in an evaporating stock pond in San Benito County and were not able to transform into terrestrial salamanders before the water dried up. © Chris Bronny |
Larvae stranded in the last bit of water remaining in a Contra Costa County pond that dried up by early June, which is much earlier than usual. © Mark Gary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
California Tiger Salamander Larvae Feeding |
|
|
|
|
A mature larva eating a Sierran Treefrog tadpole in Contra Costa County in early May. © Mark Gary |
Cannibal morph Californai Tiger Salamander larva - seen eating another CTS larva, Alameda County
© Marcia Grefsrud/CDFW |
California Tiger Salamander larvae swim around a murky pool in Contra Costa County in June, rising to the surface for a gulp of air or to attempt to eat Sierran Treefrog tadpoles. |
A mature California Tiger Salamander larva eats a Sierran Treefrog tadpole in late May. © Mark Gary
|
|
|
|
|
Predation of California Tiger Salamander Larvae |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This series shows a Diablo Range Gartersnake eating a California Tiger Salamander larva in Contra Costa County.
The snake caught the larva in the water, then brought it to shore to swallow it. © Mark Gary |
|
|
|
|
|
Aquatic larva caught by Giant Water Bug nymph, (Lethocerus sp.) which will kill it by injecting a digestive saliva then sucking out the liquefied remains. Alameda County. © Joseph E. DiDonato |
This short video shows a California Tiger Salamander larva cannibalizing another California Tiger Salamander larva.
© Grayson Sandy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Habitat for the Central California Population |
|
|
|
|
Breeding pond, Alameda County |
Breeding pond, Alameda County |
|
|
|
|
Native prairie with vernal pool breeding habitat in winter, Solano County |
Breeding pond, Alameda County
|
|
|
|
|
Grasslands habitat, Merced County |
Breeding pond, Alameda County |
Habitat, Alameda County |
Habitat, Alameda County |
|
|
|
|
Habitat, Alameda County |
Breeding pond, Santa Cruz County |
Habitat and breeding pond,
Contra Costa County |
Breeding pond in March, Contra Costa County © Grayson B. Sandy |
|
|
|
|
Breeding pond, Contra Costa County
© Mark Gary |
Breeding pond, Contra Costa County
© Mark Gary |
Habitat, breeding pond, Santa Lucia Preserve, Monterey County. Courtesy of David Keegan & Susan Whitford |
Habitat, breeding pond, Santa Lucia Preserve, Monterey County. Courtesy of David Keegan & Susan Whitford |
|
|
|
|
Breeding pond, Contra Costa County |
Breeding pond, Alameda County
© Mark Gary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Seasonal Views of a California Tiger Salamander Breeding Pond (Central California Population) |
One habitat picture can never show the whole story, so here's a series of pictures that show a small breeding pond as it looked each month during a single year (2016), illustrating how the pond and its surroundings change over the seasons. 2016 was a relatively wet year when the pond barely dried out. We have many more pictures of this pond in other years, including drought years, and after it was re-built by heavy equipment in 2017.
Follow this link to see even more pictures of this Contra Costa County pond
|
|
|
|
|
January, 2016 © Mark Gary
CA Tiger Salamander eggs are present |
February 2016 © Mark Gary
CA Tiger salamander embryos with gills are visible. Some have already hatched.
|
March, 2016 © Mark Gary |
April, 2016 © Mark Gary |
|
|
|
|
Early May, 2016 © Mark Gary |
Early June, 2016 © Mark Gary |
Early July, 2016 © Mark Gary |
Mid August, 2016 © Mark Gary |
|
|
|
|
September, 2016 © Mark Gary
|
October, 2016 © Mark Gary
|
November, 2016 © Mark Gary
|
December, 2016 © Mark Gary
CA Tiger salamander eggs were laid this year between November 26th and December 3rd. |
|
|
|
|
Click on this picture to see an animated loop of Mark Gary's photographs of the pond during every consecutive month of 2016. (Made by Zachary Cava.) |
|
|
|
|
|
Habitat for the Santa Barbara Population |
|
|
|
|
Habitat, Santa Barbara County
© William Flaxington
|
Habitat, Santa Barbara County
© William Flaxington
|
This shows the historical habitat of a museum specimen in Santa Barbara County. The area appears to have been since developed for agriculture, which is a common fate for much of the species former vernal pond breeding habitat.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Habitat for the Sonoma County Population |
|
|
|
|
Habitat in winter, Sonoma County |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California Tiger Salamander Association With California Ground Squirrels |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A California Tiger Salamander spends most of its life underground. California Ground Squirrel burrows, such as those seen here, are often a very important part of the habitat of these salamanders. An active population of burrowing ground squirrels (or other burrowing mammals) is necessary to sustain sufficient underground refuge for the salamanders since burrows that are not maintained will collapse within about 18 months. |
|
Short Videos |
|
|
|
|
These short videos each show an adult California Tiger Salamander in a very shallow pond during the breeding season in late December coming to the surface to take a quick breath of air before returning to the bottom to hide again. © Mark Gary |
California Tiger Salamander larvae swim around a murky pool in Contra Costa County in June, rising to the surface for a gulp of air or to attempt to eat Sierran Treefrog tadpoles. |
|
|
|
|
Fairly young California Tiger Salamander larvae swim around a pool in Contra Costa County in early March. You can see them lunging at food at times. |
This short video shows a California Tiger Salamander larva cannibalizing another California Tiger Salamander larva in Contra Costa County.
© Grayson Sandy |
|
|
|
|
|
Description |
|
Size |
Adults are 3-5 inches (7.6 - 12.7 cm) long from snout-to-vent, 5.9 - 8.5 inches (15-22 cm) total length.
|
Appearance |
A large stout salamander with a short rounded head, blunt snout, small protruberant eyes, no nasolabial grooves, and a tail flattened from side to side to facilitate swimming.
Usually has 12 prominent costal grooves.
Transformed adults breathe with lungs. |
Color and Pattern |
Lustrous black with large yellow spots and bars, often not present along the middle of the back.
South coast individuals may have few spots and a cream band on the lower sides. |
Young |
Larvae are yellowish gray with broad caudal fins that extend well onto the back, broad flat heads, and bushy gills
|
Life History and Behavior |
A member of the Mole Salamander family (Ambystomatidae) whose members are medium to large in size with heavy, stocky bodies.
Ambystomatid salamanders have two distinct life phases:
- Larvae hatch from eggs laid in water where they swim using an enlarged tail fin and breathe with filamentous external gills.
- Aquatic larvae transform into four-legged salamanders that live on the ground and breathe air with lungs.
|
Activity |
Nocturnal, and fossorial, spending most time underground in animal burrows, especially those of California ground squirrels, valley pocket gophers, and moles. An active population of burrowing mammals is necessary to sustain sufficient underground refuge for the salamanders since burrows that are not maintained will collapse within about 18 months. This salamander needs both suitable upland terrestrial habitat with mammal burrows for refuge and temporary breeding ponds in order to survive.
Aestivation may occur during the heat of summer, but this salamander does not need to hibernate due to the mild winters that occur in its range. Adults live to at least 11 years of age. Emerges at night with the fall rains sometimes in early November or later depending on precipitation.
Larvae are aquatic and very wary, resting motionless on the bottom when not feeding, but swimming for cover when disturbed.
Neotenic adults have not been reported, likely due to the ephemeral nature of the larval ponds.
|
Diet and Feeding |
Adults probably feed mainly on a variety of invertebrates.
Hatchlings feed on zooplankton.
Mature larvae feed on tadpoles (mostly Pseuadcris tadpoles) and aquatic invertebrates. Mature larvae have been observed cannibalizing other larvae. |
Predators |
Predators include California Red-legged Frogs, American Bullfrogs, Gartersnakes, Skunks, and Ground Squirrels. |
Reproduction |
Reproduction is aquatic.
Most breeding adults are 4 - 6 years old.
Males breed at 2 years of age, females at 2 - 3 years.
Most breeding occurs December through February.
Breeding takes place in standing water, typically in fish-free ephemeral ponds that form during winter and dry out in summer, but some salamanders may also breed in slow streams and in some semi-permanent waters, including cattle ponds, probably due to the loss of ehpemeral ponds in their habitat.
Depending on the amount and duration of rainfall, breeding activity can occuring either explosively all at once, or it can continue for several months.
Adults engage in mass migration during a few rainy nights during the rainy season from November to May and leave the pond shortly after breeding.
During years without sufficient rainfall, migrations and breeding do not occur.
Most adults return to their natal pond during their first year of breeding, but a study showed that about 30 percent bred in a different pond.
Males arrive at the breeding pond a week or two before the females, and stay about four times longer - an average of 37 - 44.7 days according to two studies, while females averaged stays of 10 - 11.8 days. Males often outnumber females.
Not much is known about the courtship of this species. Males have been observed initiating mating by activiely nudging the cloacal regions of a female. When he senses the female is ready, the male deposits a spermatophore on the bottom of the pond which is picked up by the female to fertilize her eggs. She then deposits the fertilized eggs, attaching them to vegetation in the pond.
|
Eggs |
Females lay eggs and attach them to underwater vegetation incuding grass stems, leaves, and twigs, and sometimes to objects such as metal wire.
In one study, females contained 413 - 1,340 eggs, averaging 814.
Eggs are laid singly or in groups of 2 - 4.
Egg color is pale yellow or brownish and about 2 mm in diameter.
Eggs hatch in 2 to 4 weeks. |
Larvae |
The aquatic larval stage lasts about 3 - 6 months.
Larvae undergo metamorphosis during the summer, peaking from mid June to mid July. Transformed larvae migrate away from the ponds at night under wet or dry conditions, sheltering in soil cracks and animal burrows. Rare summer rains are known to stimulate large numbers of larvae to leave the ponds, but it is thought that decreasing water levels in the ephemeral ponds also triggers emigration.
"Median emergence date can vary by at least 2 months across years and invariably precedes complete pond drying by several weeks ... At least a few metamorphic animals continue to emigrate after the pond has completely dried." (Trenham et al., 2000, cited in Lannoo, 2005).
At a Contra Costa study site the average larval period was 4 - 5 months with the mean size of metamorphs changing significantly as the season progressed.
(Loredo and Van Vuren, 1996, cited in Petranka, 1998.)
Neotenic California Tiger Salamanders have not been reported, due to the species' use of vernal pool habitats which do not allow larvae to grow into sexually mature paedomorphic adults. Where paedomorphic tiger salamanders have been found in California, they have been determined to be hybrids with eastern tiger salamanders. (Lannoo, 2005)
Robert Stebbins and others have reported that California Tiger Salamander larvae do not remain in natal ponds that do not completely dry out through the following winter, but evidence of larvae overwintering in Contra Costa County was presented in 2004. (Jeff A. Alvarez. Herpetological Review 35(4), 2004.)
|
Habitat |
Found in grassland, oak savanna, edges of mixed woodland and lower elevation coniferous forest.
|
Geographical Range |
Endemic to California.
My range map shows current, not historic distribution of California Tiger Salamanders. It is based mostly on information in a 2010 report (The State of California Natural Resources Agency Department of Fish and Game Report to the Fish and Game Commission) which uses data from the 2009 California Department of Fish and Game California Natural Diversity Data Base, which itself uses distribution data from a complete range-wide A. californiense survey made by by Shaffer et al. 1993.
The historic range of this species is not well known because it has been fragmented, but they were probably distributed throughout most of the Central Valley where there was suitable vernal pool and grassland habitat, from Tulare County north to at least Yolo County, and in the south coast ranges from San Luis Obispo County north to Monterey Bay and north, east of the Bay Area. Currently, most populations in the Central Valley have been extirpated, and the remainder are found in the surrounding foothills. Isolated populations now occur in the Sacramento Valley at Gray Lodge National Wildlife Refuge and near Dunnigan.
Sonoma County and Santa Barbara County Populations
California Tiger Salamanders in Sonoma County near Santa Rosa and in Santa Barbara County have been isolated from the rest of the species long enough that they may constitute unique species.
|
Notes on Taxonomy |
Shaffer et al (2004) found six genetically and geographically coherent sets of California Tiger Salamander populations. Four show limited genetic intermixing where they share boundaries. The Sonoma County and Santa Barbara County populations are genetically distinct and have been geographically isolated from other populations for about a million years. Each may constitute a unique species.
Alternate and Previous Names (Synonyms)
Ambystoma californiense - California Tiger Salamander (Stebbins 2003, Stebbins & Mcginnis 2012)
Ambystoma tigrinum californiense - California Tiger Salamander (Stebbins 1954, 1966, 1985
Ambystoma californiense - California Tiger Salamander (Storer 1925, Bishop 1943)
Ambystoma tigrinum; Ambystoma californiense; Ambystoma mavortium californiense; Ambystoma mavortium; Ambystoma ingens; Heterotriton ingens; Amblystoma californicum - Tiger Salamander; California Axolotl; California Salamander (Grinnell and Camp 1917)
|
Conservation Issues (Conservation Status) |
This species is protected by California State and Federal laws. The Federal Endangered Species Act divides the species into three distinct population segments, or DPS, two of which it lists as Endangered, and one as Threatened. These are the listings from State and Federally Listed Endangered and Threatened Animals of California list published by the CDFW in October 2021:
The Central California DPS
"The 2004 federal Threatened status originally applied to the species throughout its range; subsequent legal action resulted in reclassification of other DPSs to Endangered; the central California DPS remained listed as Threatened."
The Santa Barbara DPS and Sonoma County DPSs
"In 2004 the California tiger salamander was federally listed as Threatened statewide. The Santa Barbara County and Sonoma County Distinct Vertebrate Population Segments (DPS), formerly listed as Endangered, were reclassified to Threatened. On 20050819 U.S. District court vacated the down-listing of the Sonoma and Santa Barbara populations from Endangered to Threatened. Therefore, the Sonoma & Santa Barbara populations were once again listed as Endangered."
Estimated to have disappeared from more than 50 percent of its historic range. Many populations have been extirpated due to loss of or fragmentation of suitable habitat through urbanization and agriculture, and road mortality of adults during the breeding season as they migrate to and from breeding ponds across busy roadss. Eradication of California Ground Squirrels due to concerns about their effect on cattle grazing and agriculture may also threaten populations of this salamander because of its reliance on ground squirrel burrows. Predation by non-native Bullfrogs also appears to be a threat.
Hybridization with non-native Tiger Salamanders also threatens the continuity of this species. Fitzpatrick and Shaffer, 2007, found that when California Tiger Salamanders hybridize with non-native Tiger Salamanders, more of the hybrid offspring survived in the wild than did the young of the non-native Tiger Salamanders or the native California Tiger Salamanders. Ryan, Johnson, and Fitzpatrick, 2009, found that tiger salamander hybridization might even pose a threat to other threatened pond-breeding species.
In a (no longer illustrated) post on the public Field Herp Forum website on 7/20/2010, herpetologist Sam Sweet describes the problem California Tiger Salamanders face from introduced non-native tiger salamanders, and his group's efforts to eradicate the non-natives:
"California tiger salamanders are in trouble on several fronts, perhaps the most unfortunate being the widespread introduction of non-native tiger salamanders (Ambystoma mavortium ssp.) by bait dealers. Populations of A. mavortium are well-established in many places in central California, and are eliminating A. californiense by competition and predation as larvae, and by hybridization. The nonnative genotypes have the advantage in semipermanent ponds, and in places such as the Salinas Valley where they have been in contact with California tiger salamanders for several decades nearly all populations have been converted to hybrid swarms with dominant nonnative influence." ...
"We have caught this process at an earlier stage in the Santa Barbara County isolate, with nonnatives established near the edge of the range of the native species. For several years now a number of local biologists have been working to remove these animals. It’s a long process, and neither state Fish and Game nor the federal Fish and Wildlife Service has the personnel or resources to do the job in-house." ...
"These are big fellas compared to Ambystoma californiense. Ambystoma mavortium larvae don’t even think about metamorphosing until they are 8 or 9 inches long, and at least some animals will become sexually mature without metamorphosing. Those neotenes can exceed 12”, and are resident year-round, making short work of any other amphibian larvae." ...
"Like other Ambystoma the adults disperse widely after metamorphosis, and between breeding seasons, and thus they are able to hopscotch across a landscape fairly quickly. We once hoped that A. mavortium would stick to its native breeding schedule and migrate during summer rains, but they are a lot more adaptable than that, and now breed basically year-round. Having these things around simply adds to the problems the native species already faces from habitat loss, and it’s not a pretty situation."
|
|
Taxonomy |
Family |
Ambystomatidae |
Mole Salamanders |
Gray, 1850 |
Genus |
Ambystoma |
Mole Salamanders |
Tschudi, 1838 |
Species
|
californiense |
California Tiger Salamander |
Gray, 1853 |
Original description |
Gray, 1853 - Proc. Zool. Soc. London, Vol. 21, p. 11, pl.
from Original Description Citations for the Reptiles and Amphibians of North America © Ellin Beltz
|
Meaning of the Scientific Name |
Ambystoma: anabystoma - to cram into the mouth. Possibly derived from Amblystoma: Greek - blunt mouth.
californiense: belonging to the state of California.
from Scientific and Common Names of the Reptiles and Amphibians of North America - Explained © Ellin Beltz
|
Related or Similar California Salamanders |
Barred Tiger Salamander
Blotched Tiger Salamander
Arizona Tiger Salamander
Southern Long-toed Salamander
Santa Cruz Long-toed Salamander
Large-Blotched Ensatina
|
More Information and References |
California Tiger Salamander Breeding Activity Blog Page
California Department of Fish and Wildlife
AmphibiaWeb
Center for Biological Diversity
Hansen, Robert W. and Shedd, Jackson D. California Amphibians and Reptiles. (Princeton Field Guides.) Princeton University Press, 2025.
Stebbins, Robert C., and McGinnis, Samuel M. Field Guide to Amphibians and Reptiles of California: Revised Edition (California Natural History Guides) University of California Press, 2012.
Stebbins, Robert C. California Amphibians and Reptiles. The University of California Press, 1972.
Flaxington, William C. Amphibians and Reptiles of California: Field Observations, Distribution, and Natural History. Fieldnotes Press, Anaheim, California, 2021.
Samuel M. McGinnis and Robert C. Stebbins. Peterson Field Guide to Western Reptiles & Amphibians. 4th Edition. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company, 2018.
Stebbins, Robert C. A Field Guide to Western Reptiles and Amphibians. 3rd Edition. Houghton Mifflin Company, 2003.
Behler, John L., and F. Wayne King. The Audubon Society Field Guide to North American Reptiles and Amphibians. Alfred A. Knopf, 1992.
Powell, Robert., Joseph T. Collins, and Errol D. Hooper Jr. A Key to Amphibians and Reptiles of the Continental United States and Canada. The University Press of Kansas, 1998.
American Museum of Natural History - Amphibian Species of the World 6.2
Bartlett, R. D. & Patricia P. Bartlett. Guide and Reference to the Amphibians of Western North America (North of Mexico) and Hawaii. University Press of Florida, 2009.
Bishop, Sherman C. Handbook of Salamanders. Cornell University Press, 1943.
Lannoo, Michael (Editor). Amphibian Declines: The Conservation Status of United States Species. University of California Press, June 2005.
Petranka, James W. Salamanders of the United States and Canada. Smithsonian Institution, 1998.
Benjamin M. Fitzpatrick and H. Bradley Shaffer. Hybrid vigor between native and introduced salamanders raises new challenges for conservation.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, October 2, 2007 vol. 104 no. 40 15793–15798.
www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.0704791104
Maureen E. Ryana, Jarrett R. Johnson, and Benjamin M. Fitzpatrick. Invasive hybrid tiger salamander genotypes impact native amphibians.
pnas July 7, 2009 vol. 106 no. 27 11169.
www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.0902252106
The State of California Natural Resources Agency Department of Fish and Game
Report to the Fish and Game Commission - A Status Review of the California Tiger Salamander (Ambystoma californiense) January 11, 2010.
Shaffer, H.B., R.N. Fisher, and S.E. Stanley. 1993. Status Report: The California tiger salamander (Ambystoma californiense). Final report to California Department of Fish and Game, Inland Fisheries Division, Contract #FG9422 and FG1393.
Shaffer, H.B., G.B. Pauly, J.C. Oliver, and P.C. Trenham. 2004. The molecular phylogenetics of endangerment: cryptic variation and historical phylogeography of the California tiger salamander, Ambystoma californiense. Molecular Ecology 13:3033-3049
Joseph Grinnell and Charles Lewis Camp. A Distributional List of the Amphibians and Reptiles of California. University of California Publications in Zoology Vol. 17, No. 10, pp. 127-208. July 11, 1917.
|
|